Reading roadmap · Updated 2026-07-10
Articles and reading paths 文章与阅读路线
Start with one definition, then choose the boundary, comparison or application question you actually need. Evidence and source records remain shared across every level. 先用一篇定义建立坐标，再按需要进入概念边界、路线比较或行业应用。不同深度的文章共用同一套证据与来源记录。
Start here 从这里开始
Build the smallest useful mental model before comparing products or labs. 先建立最小但够用的概念，再比较产品和团队。
Boundary 概念边界
Use a contested example to learn what public evidence can and cannot establish. 用一个有争议的案例理解：公开证据究竟能证明什么、不能证明什么。
Comparison 路线比较
Compare systems by what they predict, what controls them and who can use the output. 按照预测对象、控制接口和输出用途比较系统，而不是把所有路线混成一个榜单。
Professional references 专业参考
Evaluate claims with a reusable framework, then see how the evidence changes in a concrete engineering domain. 先用可复用框架评估能力声明，再进入具体工程领域观察证据如何变化。
How do you evaluate a world model? 如何判断一个世界模型真的有效？
Nine dimensions, route-specific metrics and an evidence checklist that begins with downstream decisions. 九个维度、按路线调整的指标，以及从下游决策出发的证据检查清单。
Professional · 18 min 专业 · 18 分钟Why autonomous driving needs world models 自动驾驶为什么需要世界模型？
Traditional simulation versus learned models, statistical mileage limits, closed-loop evidence and validation risk. 传统仿真与学习型模型、真实里程的统计限制、闭环证据和验证风险。
Reference layer 专业资料层
Audit a claim, understand the editorial rules or follow substantive changes. 核对判断、理解编辑规则，或持续跟踪会改变读者结论的更新。
Sources 资料源
Article, team, claim and source mappings with access and review notes. 文章、团队、判断和来源之间的映射，以及访问与复核说明。
Editorial protocol 编辑协议Method 编辑方法
How official claims, technical reports, conflicts and uncertainty are handled. 本站如何处理官方声明、技术报告、来源冲突和不确定性。
Reader updates 读者更新Updates 更新
New articles, material evidence changes and substantive corrections, with RSS. 新文章、重要证据变化和实质纠正，并提供 RSS。